- What is the surgical (classical) treatment of varicose veins
- History of surgical treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities
- Surgical (traditional) treatment of varicose veins, why the technique is not perfect
- What types of surgical (classical) treatment of varicose veins are used today in the world and in Russia
- Surgery (combined phlebectomy) - indications and contraindications
- Surgical treatment (combined phlebectomy) - surgery technique
- Surgical (classic) treatment of varicose veins - postoperative period
- Surgical treatment (combined phlebectomy) in the treatment of varicose veins - complications
- Surgical treatment of varicose veins patients reviews
- What we offer today instead of the classical surgical treatment of varicose veins
- Surgical treatment of varicose veins (combined phlebectomy) why is actively practiced today
- Surgical treatment of varicose veins of the lower extremities, why did we completely abandon it?
- Questions from patients on the Internet about the surgical treatment of varicose veins (combined phlebectomy)
Surgical (classical) treatment of varicose veins, combined phlebectomy or stripping is a surgical operation consisting in the removal of the trunk of a large and (or) small saphenous vein and their varicose veins.
Removal of the trunk of a large saphenous vein on the thigh - classic phlebectomy
Combined phlebectomy in Moscow is a radical method of treating varicose veins and remains in the arsenal of phlebologists and surgeons, mainly of state medical institutions.
The history of surgical treatment of varicose veins is closely related to the study of, actually, varicose veins. A German doctor, Friedrich von Trendelenburg, suggested a causal relationship between varicose veins and blood reflux in the area of safeno-femoral anastomosis. In 1860, Trendelenburg, on the basis of this theory, proposed a method for the surgical treatment of varicose veins by crossing and ligation of the trunk of the saphenous vein in the upper third of the thigh.
Founder of phlebectomy - Friedrich von Trendelenburg
It is safe to say that the modern stage of phlebology, as a medical science, began precisely then. Further, an outstanding domestic doctor, Alexei Alekseevich Troyanov, suggested applying a vein ligation using double ligature and excising a section of a large saphenous vein. In fairness, it is worth noting that none of these luminaries of his time insisted on the obligatory ligation of the great saphenous vein at the level of the safeno-femoral anastomosis. Oddly enough, extremely traumatic and aggressive methods provided the further development of phlebological science. The greatest contribution to the understanding of the anatomy of varicose veins of the saphenous vein and the pathophysiology of reflux was probably made by Modelung’s surgery. The essence of the technique is the removal of a large saphenous vein through a strip incision throughout the entire venous vessel, from the groin to the ankle. Most sane surgeons abstained from the practical application of this operation, but their contribution to the knowledge of venous anatomy was certainly significant. Most importantly, it became clear that the trunk of a large saphenous vein needed to be removed. Already in the 1908 year, V.V. Babcock proposed the option of removing a large saphenous vein using a special probe. Such an innovation, of course, was a breakthrough of its time and the first step to radically reduce the injury rate of the intervention, while retaining all the advantages of removing the trunk of the saphenous vein. With minor changes, mainly related to the design of the probe, the technique has been successfully applied for many decades. A number of specialists, mainly of state medical institutions, do not doubt the relevance of Babcock combined phlebectomy even today, in the 21 century.
Combined phlebectomy at the time made a splash, a kind of revolution both in the treatment and understanding of the pathogenesis of varicose veins. More than a century has passed since that moment, today milder versions of anesthesiological aid and other surgical instruments are used, but no fundamental changes have occurred in this surgical technique. Even with the advent of innovations in the form of: PIN-stripping, intravaginal stripping and cryostripping, the technique essentially remained the same.
Cryostripping - cold varicose removal
Classical combined phlebectomy using the Babcock probe remains today the most common for the treatment of varicose veins in the public sector of medicine in view of the unobvious benefits of the above innovations.
What types of surgical (classical) treatment of varicose veins are used today in the world and in Russia
In modern European practice, the following combined phlebectomy techniques are used, the main difference of which is the design of the probe for removing the vein:
- Phleboextraction using a Bebkokok probe. Perhaps the most radical and reliable, but also traumatic way to remove veins.
- Invagination stripping
- PIN stripping is the most popular modification of invagination stripping, it requires sufficient experience from the operator, but the surgical trauma is slightly reduced.
- Cryostripping is a high-tech variant of invagination stripping. He earned special trust in the medical community of Japan, which led to the widespread dissemination of the technique in the country of the rising sun. The methods of endovasal thermobliteration that appeared on the forefront late on time were probably the cause of a single heart attack among medical officials of this country.
To the advantages of surgical treatment (combined phlebectomy), at this point, you can withstand a long pause, similar to a minute of silence. But still, we list the nuances of the classical surgical approach, which can be attributed to the advantages. There must be reasons why combined phlebectomy remains the most common in the treatment of varicose veins.
- For combined phlebectomy, innovative technologies and expensive equipment are optional. There are enough instrumental and human resources available in most departments of general and vascular surgery.
- Severe surgical trauma, severe anesthesia, a long rehabilitation period often serve as a good psychological argument in favor of the exceptional radicalism of this method of treatment of varicose veins.
- Using a technique familiar to surgeons in the public sector is much easier than learning something new. Moreover, to use modern technologies it is necessary not only to buy expensive equipment, but also to seriously change the logistic schemes of work and training of specialists.
Frankly speaking, the classical surgical treatment of varicose veins (combined phlebectomy) did not have a single argument in its defense, except for the financial one. The last statement can also be challenged, since it follows from the significantly lower cost of a hospitalized patient in the surgery department. Also, no one particularly calculated the economic losses, both of the patient himself and of society as a whole, associated with long-term rehabilitation, using classical surgery. The statement about the greater radicalism of combined phlebectomy, regarding innovative methods today, with the transparency of statistical data, can be safely attributed to speculation on this topic.
Cuts for phlebectomy - why is it needed?
Today, a good surgeon is no longer proud of large incisions. The main argument of a modern specialist is the treatment carried out in the shortest possible time with the maximum clinical effect.
Indications for classic surgery (combined phlebectomy) are the presence of various manifestations of varicose veins:
- The presence of varicose veins in the lower extremities
- Venous eczema.
- Trophic venous ulcer.
- Venous bleeding.
Contraindications for combined phlebectomy (stripping):
- severe chronic pathology (for example, uncompensated forms of diabetes mellitus, hypertension) infectious processes on the skin of the legs;
- acute deep vein thrombosis;
- established thrombophilia;
- severe forms of atherosclerotic lesions of the arteries of the lower extremities;
- pregnancy and lactation;
- prolonged immobilization of patients;
- the inability to use prolonged compression on the lower extremities.
Modern combined phlebectomy is performed under anesthesia or epidural anesthesia. After processing the surgical field, ligation and intersection of the main saphenous vein (large or small) is performed in the area of safeno-femoral or safenopopliteal anastomosis, i.e. crossectomy. To access these sections of the venous vessels, incisions are used along the inguinal or popliteal folds. The length of the cuts varies from one and a half to several centimeters.
Stages of classical phlebectomy
Stripping, removal of saphenous vein trunks with a special probe is performed, followed by removal of the main vein inflows. After controlling hemostasis, aseptic dressings are applied, compression garments or bandages are put on.
In the postoperative period, patients take antibiotics to exclude suppuration of postoperative wounds, pain medications, phlebotonics and anticoagulants. A series of dressings is performed, stitches are removed, usually within 1-2 weeks. The approach to activating patients, as well as the timing of wearing compression knitwear, is determined by the attending doctor. These parameters often depend on the experience of such operations and the personal preferences of the doctor. Hospitalization of patients after classical surgery lasts from 2-3 days to 2 weeks (average 7 days).
The terms of full rehabilitation after combined phlebectomy vary from a few weeks to 2-3 months. It depends on the rate of epithelialization of postoperative wounds, the presence or absence of postoperative complications.
Combined phlebectomy, like any extensive and rather traumatic surgical intervention, is often complicated by the following unpleasant consequences:
- Bleeding from postoperative wounds.
- The formation of hematomas, seromas.
- Infection of postoperative wounds.
- The formation of lymphorrhea and lymphocele.
- Neovasculogenesis (the appearance of a network of varicose veins in the area of safeno-femoral anastomosis).
- Paresthesia and local permanent anesthesia for damage to the skin nerves.
- Thromboembolic complications up to the development of pulmonary embolism.
The last point should be discussed in detail, because despite the whole range of measures taken to prevent these complications, it is very difficult to completely avoid them. Despite the introduction of the latest anticoagulants into the practice of a modern surgeon, the presence of significant postoperative trauma, skin incisions does not allow the main tool to be used in the fight against venous thrombosis. Namely, early revitalization. Fear of the development of bleeding and hematomas in the operated patients is a weighty argument, but the longer the patient returns to his usual activity, the higher the risk of thrombosis.
Reviews of patients who underwent surgical treatment of varicose veins in Moscow and other Russian cities are quite diverse, as are patients who underwent treatment. It is much more interesting, probably, to read the reviews of patients who were treated with legs, both with the help of classical surgery and innovative methods of thermobliteration.
Everything changed about 20 years ago with the advent of the first successful attempts at endovasal thermobliteration. It was a significant technological breakthrough that radically changed phlebology. The initial clinical experience with thermobliteration was on the verge of a medical experiment. This stage goes through any innovative technology. In that period of the first steps and the establishment of the thermobliteration technique, one could talk about its competition with classical surgery.
Laser radial fiber
After the advent of radial optical fibers for laser coagulation in the 2008 year, there was no longer any talk of a significant opposition to combined phlebectomy (in any form) and endovasal thermobliteration. What are the benefits of endovascular surgery for varicose veins:
- Fine control of manipulation through ultrasound imaging
- Minimal invasiveness, only skin punctures.
- A mild anesthetic aid in the form of local tumescent anesthesia.
- Full ambulance of all procedures.
- Good tolerance by patients as a manipulation, and the postoperative period.
The classical surgical treatment of varicose veins, combined phlebectomy or stripping, which has already been said, is actively used and even remains the main method of treating varicose veins in state medical institutions. Ideal fans of combined phlebectomy are enough. Here you can omit the economic, logistical and personnel issues of long-suffering domestic medicine. Many are aware of these problems. To the credit of domestic state medicine, it should be noted that in many, much more successful European countries, combined phlebectomy is also used. As practice shows, innovation is most difficult to take root in the field of the public sector of medicine. The technique of combined phlebectomy is so firmly entrenched in state medical institutions, all the nuances are worked out so much, up to disability with not very successful treatment, that in 10 years we are likely to see a classic surgical operation in a state hospital.
As mentioned above, the classical surgical treatment of varicose veins is actively used in European medical practice, including Moscow, Moscow Region and other Russian cities.
To the question: why so, and why use horses when there are already good cars? Using an operation with a century of history, we lose the following advantages of innovation:
- There is no ultrasound imaging. Control of the intervention is carried out through the surgical wound; to improve visibility, it is necessary to enlarge the incision.
- Significantly increased operational injury. This not only increases the rehabilitation period, but also affects the possible complications of side effects.
- The effectiveness of the treatment is reduced.
- Detachment, in most cases, of a doctor treating an ultrasound diagnosis.
- Trauma, sometimes significant, at the sites of incisions and phleboextraction loci.
- Pseudoradicalism. As practice shows, with phlebectomy, with very rare exceptions, much less varicose veins are removed than when using modern techniques.
In the practice of the Moscow City Phlebological Center we use only the best modern techniques and combined phlebectomy there has long been no place.
Questions from patients on the Internet about surgical treatment of varicose veins (combined phlebectomy) in Moscow
Lyudmila from Moscow asks: what is the cost of a combined phlebectomy operation in your center?
Dear Lyudmila! The Moscow City Phlebological Center quite a long time ago completely abandoned the use of this technique. This happened after the introduction of innovative thermal obliteration technologies into our practice. You can get acquainted with the cost of the services of our center by phone: 8 (495) 565 35 09, or on the page of our website: https://phlebolog.org/tseny.
Cyril from Moscow is interested in: how effective is the operation of combined phlebectomy?
Dear Cyril! The operation of combined phlebectomy for varicose veins of the lower extremities proved its effectiveness over a hundred years ago. In experienced hands, a combined phlebectomy operation effectively eliminates major varicose veins. Compared with modern methods of removing varicose veins, especially in the long term, today a good phlebologist will refrain from recommending classical phlebectomy.
Maria from Balashikha near Moscow is interested in: how do I understand from the reviews where a phlebectomy of the veins of the lower extremities is done well, how much does the operation cost?
Dear Maria! The Internet is full of various sites offering the most "reliable and competent" reviews of patients who underwent a variety of treatments, including combined phlebectomy. It is not worth describing all the nuances of this procedure for a long time, despite the fact that the specialists of the Moscow City Phlebology Center have gained considerable experience in these operations. Today, the combined phlebectomy technique is not relevant. The cost of a modern endovasal procedure will successfully pay off with a soft and comfortable postoperative period, the absence of complications and relapses of the disease.
Vladlena from Moscow asks: how long does the postoperative period of combined phlebectomy last?
Dear Vladlena! The postoperative period of combined phlebectomy surgery takes 1-3 weeks, sometimes longer. Recovery time will depend on the state of postoperative sutures, the presence or absence of swelling, the general condition of the patient.
Elena from Moscow asks: what is the best surgery for varicose veins of the lower extremities?
Dear Elena! Today in Moscow, many technologies are used to treat varicose veins. Classical surgical treatment in the face of combined phlebectomy is hopelessly outdated; ultramodern non-thermal obliteration techniques still show frankly slurred results. If you want to be guaranteed to get rid of varicose veins in one procedure, then you should recommend the methods of thermal obliteration (laser or radio frequency).